John 10:34-38 Did Jesus say He was God?

And what did He mean by 'you are gods?'

So these are the discussions that arise surrounding this passage. Let’s examine like a scholar, and see where the Holy Spirit leads

.

Our Discipleship Studies are Thursday evenings, 8pm eastern. Zoom Link on our site, www.TheHiddenDay.com

John 10:34 is a verse that has sparked many theological discussions due to its complex wording and context. Jesus, addressing Jewish leaders who accuse Him of blasphemy for claiming to be the Son of God, says, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'?" Here, Jesus references Psalm 82:6, where God addresses certain human judges as “gods.” This unusual phrasing has generated diverse interpretations and arguments in the areas of divine authority, human identity, and biblical interpretation. Here are some of the main discussions:

 1. Jesus’ Use of the Term “Gods”

   - Human Judges as "Gods": Many scholars agree that Jesus is referring to human judges in Psalm 82, where God calls them "gods" (Hebrew: *elohim*) because they held positions of authority. This term does not imply deity but rather indicates individuals with God-given authority to execute justice.

   - Justification Against Blasphemy Charges: Jesus uses this verse to challenge His accusers. His argument is essentially: if Scripture refers to human judges as "gods," why should it be blasphemous for Him, the one whom God sent and sanctified, to call Himself the Son of God?

 2. Implications for Jesus’ Divinity

   - An Indirect Assertion of Divinity: By quoting Psalm 82, Jesus isn’t denying His divine identity; instead, He reframes the discussion. If lesser figures in the Bible can be called "gods," then His claim to be the Son of God (and thus divine) is far greater and, therefore, justified. This is often seen as Jesus making a sophisticated, indirect assertion of His divinity without directly engaging in a blasphemous claim, according to Jewish law.

   - Unity with the Father: Following this verse, Jesus reaffirms His unique unity with the Father. The entire dialogue suggests that Jesus sees His identity as far superior to that of the judges, linking His mission and essence directly to God in a way that surpasses any previous figure in Scripture.

 3. The Doctrine of Theosis

   - Believers as “Sons of God”: Some Christian traditions, particularly in Eastern Orthodox theology, interpret this verse within the doctrine of *theosis*—the idea that believers participate in God’s divine nature. While humans are not “gods” in the same sense as God is, they are called to a close relationship with Him, reflecting divine qualities and participating in His holiness. Jesus quoting Psalm 82:6 is seen by some as pointing to this call to divine fellowship and transformation for believers.

 4. Interpretive Challenges: Jesus’ Use of the Law

   - “Your Law”: Jesus’ reference to "your Law" has raised interpretive questions. Some scholars argue that by saying “your Law,” Jesus differentiates between His divine perspective and the leaders’ limited understanding of Scripture, which they use to accuse Him.

   - Defense via the Scriptures: Jesus’ use of Scripture here showcases His profound understanding and authority over the Law, turning His accusers’ own scriptures against them. This approach highlights Jesus as the ultimate interpreter of Scripture, establishing His authority over even the religious leaders.

 5. The Nature of Authority in Scripture

   - Human Authority as Reflecting God’s Authority: In Psalm 82, judges are reprimanded for failing to uphold justice, underscoring that their authority was delegated by God. Jesus’ reference here may imply that all human authority is accountable to God and that He Himself is the ultimate representative of divine justice and authority.

   - Contrast with Jesus’ Perfect Authority: Some theologians see Jesus’ use of Psalm 82 as a contrast between the flawed human judges and His perfect role as the true Son of God, who embodies divine justice and authority fully and without corruption.

 6. Apologetic and Theological Arguments

   - Response to Skepticism and Blasphemy: Jesus’ response offers an apologetic argument against those who dismiss or misunderstand His claims. By referencing a familiar passage, He challenges the religious leaders to rethink their accusations and to see Him as more than just another prophet or teacher.

   - God’s Presence Among Humans: Jesus’ argument hints at the broader biblical theme of God working through human figures and eventually taking on human form in the person of Jesus. This verse has been central in discussions about how God can and does reveal Himself through human channels, ultimately culminating in the incarnation.

 7. Historical Jewish Interpretations

   - Jewish Interpretations of Psalm 82: Jewish interpretations traditionally view Psalm 82 as directed at Israelite leaders or judges who misused their authority. Jesus’ use of this passage aligns with Jewish expectations but points beyond them, inviting His listeners to reconsider the depth of His identity.

   - Challenging the Jewish Leaders: Jesus’ reference to “gods” ascribed to human judges in their own Scripture undercuts the leaders’ critique and forces them to acknowledge the unique role and authority He possesses.

 8. Modern Applications and Understanding

   - Understanding of Identity and Calling: For modern readers, this passage raises questions about the nature of authority and identity in a biblical context. While humans are not divine, Jesus' words can remind believers of their calling to reflect God’s justice and character, as originally intended for Israel’s leaders.

   - Humility and Authority: This verse can serve as a reminder of the limits of human authority and the importance of humility, even for those in leadership roles. Jesus highlights that any authority held by humans is given by God, emphasizing the accountability that comes with it.

 Conclusion

John 10:34 is a complex, theologically rich verse where Jesus challenges His accusers using a profound scriptural reference to highlight both the limits and the potential of human authority in relation to God’s divine authority. This verse has stirred extensive discussions on divine-human interaction, the nature of biblical authority, and the divinity of Christ, all of which remain central to Christian theology and apologetics.

John 10:38 is a verse where Jesus says, "But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father." This statement has sparked various theological discussions and interpretations across Christian traditions, mainly concerning Christ's divinity, the nature of His relationship with God the Father, and the evidence of faith. Here are some of the prominent arguments and discussions:

 1. Jesus' Claim to Divinity

   - Unity with the Father: Many interpret Jesus' statement "the Father is in me, and I in the Father" as an affirmation of His divine nature and unity with God. This verse, along with others in John, is seen as reinforcing the doctrine of the Trinity by showing an inseparable bond between Jesus and God.

   - Opposition from Religious Authorities: In context, the Jewish leaders saw Jesus’ claim as blasphemous. They interpreted His words as a claim to equality with God, which led to their attempts to stone Him. This has prompted discussions on the nature of Jesus' statements and the perceived implications of claiming unity with God.

 2. Faith Based on Works

   - Signs as Evidence: Some theologians argue that Jesus encouraged belief in His divine mission through the miracles He performed ("the works"). By pointing to His works, Jesus provided tangible evidence of His authority and divine connection, suggesting that faith can be strengthened by witnessing God’s power in action.

   - Faith Beyond Miracles: Others caution against a faith solely reliant on miracles, noting that Jesus often emphasized belief based on His word and teachings, not merely on signs. This viewpoint reflects the idea that miracles can confirm faith but should not be the foundation of it.

 3. Nature of Belief and Knowledge

   - Knowing vs. Believing: Jesus’ call to “know and understand” the unity between Him and the Father highlights a deeper level of faith that transcends mere belief. Some argue this phrase suggests that faith involves both intellectual acknowledgment and relational experience, encouraging a holistic understanding of God.

   - Faith in Difficulties: Others see this as a model for believers to trust in God’s works in their lives, especially when faith is tested. Jesus encourages people to focus on the evidence of God’s presence, even when understanding is incomplete or when direct belief is challenging.

 4. Christology and Trinitarian Doctrine

   - Prefiguring the Trinity: The language of mutual indwelling (“the Father is in me, and I am in the Father”) is often interpreted as laying the groundwork for the doctrine of the Trinity. Although the formal doctrine of the Trinity wasn’t defined until later, passages like John 10:38 are viewed as foundational to understanding the interrelation of Father, Son, and Spirit.

   - Ontological vs. Functional Relationship: Some theologians debate whether Jesus’ unity with the Father refers to an ontological (being-based) or functional (role-based) relationship. This involves intricate theological distinctions, particularly in how Jesus’ divine nature and mission align within the Godhead.

 5. Relationship Between Jesus and the Father in Action

   - Works as Divine Revelation: Another perspective is that Jesus’ works reveal the Father’s will and nature. By emphasizing His actions as a reflection of the Father, Jesus shows that His mission is not independent but fully aligned with God, aiming to reveal God's character through deeds.

   - Missional Unity: This view also reinforces the concept that Jesus’ purpose and actions are inseparable from the Father’s purpose, suggesting a profound unity in mission and intent between Jesus and God.

 6. Application for Believers: Following in Faithful Works

   - Emulating Christ’s Works: Some interpreters focus on the implications for believers, suggesting that faith is made evident through works. Just as Jesus demonstrated His relationship with the Father through His works, believers are encouraged to live in a way that reflects their faith and God’s character.

   - Faith and Works in Christian Life: This verse has contributed to discussions about the balance between faith and works, touching on themes of grace and how true faith naturally expresses itself in action, aligning with the teachings of James and Paul on faith and deeds.

 7. Apologetic Use of Miracles

   - Defense Against Skepticism: Apologists often refer to this passage when addressing skeptics who demand tangible evidence. Jesus’ call to “believe the works” suggests that God provides observable realities (like miracles or transformed lives) as proof of divine truth, offering grounds for belief even to those initially skeptical of the supernatural.

 Conclusion

In John 10:38, Jesus offers a profound statement that continues to inspire theological reflection on His divinity, the relationship between faith and works, and the nature of God’s revelation through Jesus’ ministry. These discussions span historical, doctrinal, and practical applications, making it a rich topic for study in understanding Christian belief and doctrine.